Book a Demo
← Back to overview

On-Premise vs. Cloud BPM: What Enterprise Systems Truly Need

The Unique Demands of Enterprise BPM

CIOs and IT leaders in large organizations (>1000 employees) navigate constant pressure: digitize processes, modernize systems, ensure compliance – ideally all at once, without disrupting operations. Business Process Management (BPM) is a cornerstone of this digital transformation journey.

However, the enterprise landscape operates under different rules than the mid-market. Complex, heterogeneous IT environments, stringent security protocols, regulatory mandates (like GDPR or industry-specific rules), and deep integration requirements often render standardized Cloud-only BPM approaches impractical or insufficient. The need for control and flexibility is paramount.

Cloud Promises vs. Enterprise Reality

Cloud vendors rightly emphasize benefits like rapid deployment, automatic updates, and elastic scaling. While valid points, their relevance for large, established organizations needs careful consideration:

  • Cost Predictability: Cloud isn’t automatically cheaper when factoring in long-term contracts, data transfer (egress) costs, integration middleware, and specialized support needs.
  • Data Sovereignty & Security: Housing sensitive process data outside the company’s own controlled infrastructure is often a non-starter due to compliance regulations or internal security policies.
  • Integration Depth: Integrating Cloud-only BPM deeply with core On-Premise systems (SAP, legacy databases, specialized DMS, LDAP/AD) can be complex, costly, or functionally limited compared to solutions designed for hybrid environments.

The reality we often observe: Large enterprises sometimes adopt Cloud solutions not purely out of technical preference, but due to strategic vendor pressure or the lack of viable, modern On-Premise alternatives for specific SaaS offerings.

On-Premise: Declared Dead, Yet Critically Relevant

On-Premise vs Cloud

On-Premise BPM is far from a relic. Many of our clients, some for over 20 years, successfully operate and evolve sophisticated BPM solutions within their own data centers. The reasons are compelling:

  • Complete Control: Full command over data, processes, infrastructure, security configurations, and the update lifecycle.
  • Leveraging Existing Infrastructure: Utilizing established, hardened security measures, monitoring tools, and operational expertise.
  • Meeting Specific Requirements: Addressing unique performance, latency, or integration needs that standard cloud offerings cannot fulfill.
  • Stable Operations: Updates are planned, tested, and deployed according to internal schedules, ensuring critical business processes run without unexpected disruptions from third-party changes or API deprecations.

Private Cloud: The Controlled Bridge

A pragmatic middle ground has emerged in many enterprises: the Private Cloud. Whether hosted in a company’s own Kubernetes environment, on Azure/AWS/GCP virtual private clouds, or other dedicated virtualization platforms, the key element remains architectural control.

flying dog software actively supports customers in designing and operating hybrid setups. Sensitive core processes might run On-Premise, while less critical components, like user-facing portals, can reside in a controlled Private Cloud instance. This allows organizations to blend flexibility with uncompromising security and control.

Example: An international industrial company runs its core flying dog BPM engine and sensitive data processing On-Premise, leveraging a dedicated Azure instance solely for the role-based, CI-customized User Portal, connected via secure, clearly defined data flows.

Key Decision Factors: Beyond the Hype

Choosing the right deployment model isn’t an ideological battle; it requires evaluating concrete requirements:

  • Compliance & Data Governance: What regulations apply (GDPR, industry-specific)? Must data reside within specific geographical boundaries? How granular must logging and auditing be?
  • Integration Capabilities: How deeply must the BPM system interact with existing applications (ERP, CRM, bespoke systems)? Are standard connectors sufficient, or is deep customization required? Does it support existing authentication mechanisms seamlessly?
  • Operational Control & Support: Who manages the infrastructure and application? How are updates handled? What are the SLAs? Are 2nd/3rd level support models available that align with internal capabilities while ensuring expert backup?
  • Flexibility & Customization: Can the user interface be fully adapted to corporate identity? Can custom functionalities be integrated where needed (e.g., via hooks)?

Our experience confirms: Large organizations need a BPM system that integrates into their reality, offering flexibility rather than imposing a rigid deployment model.

Conclusion: Architectural Competence Trumps Ideology

Whether Cloud, On-Premise, or Hybrid – the fundamental question for enterprise BPM is: How adaptable is the platform to your specific IT strategy and constraints? There’s no one-size-fits-all answer. The critical factor is a provider’s ability and willingness to understand existing structures, support diverse operational models, and provide a platform flexible enough to accommodate them intelligently.

For over two decades, flying dog software has partnered with large organizations navigating precisely this landscape. Our platform is designed to run effectively in traditional data centers, on modern Kubernetes clusters, or within controlled Private Cloud environments. Our guiding principle remains: Technology must follow strategy – not the other way around. We provide the architectural competence and flexible platform to make that a reality.